--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > 
> > > There were some messages on the list saying that
> Cactus (and some other
> > > propositions) had not reached as super majority
> and thus were not approved
> > > yet as part of Commons Proper (or whatever name
> it is now).
> > > 
> > > I'd really like to go ahead and move Cactus from
> the sandbox to the Commons
> > > proper as it is now ready for the move ... Can I
> go along (I am not sure
> > > anymore if Cactus has been accepted in the end
> or not ... ) ?
> > > 
> > 
> > I count three +1 votes (Vincent, Geir, Craig) and
> no other votes -- from
> > three out of the four people who have ever
> committed anything.  What's the
> > problem?
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I found Rodney's +1 as well.  That makes
> everyone.

<sniff>I guess my xmlunit and website stuff doesn't
warrant voting priveledges.</sniff>  :)  +1 for moving
to the commons proper.

=====
Morgan Delagrange
Britannica.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to