"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I've heard some pushback about the "jakarta" redundancy in the name of
> this mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). A couple of
> alternatives have been suggested:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (short and sweet)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (consistent with other lists)
>
> Any thoughts?
I like jakarta-commons, as I think that while it appears redundant, I
think it hints at the intent of being something of a Commons for
Jakarta. It might be interesting if we try and explain the intent
behind j-c, and see if we still get pushback.
The problem I see with commons-dev is that people are trained to keep
user qustions on a -user list. So we could start one of those too if we
have a -dev
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
