Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:
> craig> Sounds like a good reason to not use Stylebook to me :-).
>
> geir> Hey! Bring on Anakia, and if the existing DTD doesn't light your
> lucky,
> geir> lets change it...
>
> Hey, indeed. An Anakia DTD. Where is that again?
>
> (No really, I've been looking (and asking) for the Anakia DTD for a while.)
>
> I'd be much happier with the whole xdocs thing if we just had a conventional
> DTD/Schema/whatever. *Then* we could haggle about how we're going to
> transform it into HTML or anything else.
>
> Frankly I don't see much need for anything but a decent DTD and a clever set
> of XSLT stylesheets, but if we agree on a DTD, I don't think the
> transformation technology matters much.
>
> - Rod
That's why NW invented DocBook! If you were to use that, then you can
create the site and other types of documentation. Stylesheets are
already in existence to do the work.
The only problem is choosing the subset of DocBook ;-)
Scott Sanders
