At 04:53 13/4/01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Scott Sanders wrote:
>
>> > Frankly I don't see much need for anything but a decent DTD and a
clever set
>> > of XSLT stylesheets, but if we agree on a DTD, I don't think the
>> > transformation technology matters much.
>> >
>> > - Rod
>>
>> That's why NW invented DocBook! If you were to use that, then you can
>> create the site and other types of documentation. Stylesheets are
>> already in existence to do the work.
>>
>> The only problem is choosing the subset of DocBook ;-)
>
>Scott, I hope this is a joke - using DocBook ???? But docbook was not
>invented here, and is used only by all other open source projects.
>
>How could we use a standard DTD for technical documentation ? We're not
>Linux.
so true it is sad ;(
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
