[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > How freaky. I just added the same thing but as a part of a > CollectionsUtils class. I thought the same thing when I happened upon it while looking through CollectionUtils! :) > I thought that would be a good way to hide it so > a later stage could see it using the Commons.Collections version. I really wanted to have the Util pacakge not depend upon any other libraries. Do you think we should make an exception in case of the Collections library?
- cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/util/src/java/org/... dlr
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/util/src/... bayard
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/util/... Daniel Rall
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/u... bayard
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/u... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: cvs commit:jakarta-commons-sandbo... Jon Stevens
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-... bayard
- generic-utils (was Re: cvs c... Charles Burdick
- Re: generic-utils (was R... bayard
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-... Craig R. McClanahan
- Util dependency on Collections? Daniel Rall
- Re: Util dependency on Collectio... James Strachan