[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> How freaky. I just added the same thing but as a part of a
> CollectionsUtils class.

I thought the same thing when I happened upon it while looking through
CollectionUtils!  :)

> I thought that would be a good way to hide it so
> a later stage could see it using the Commons.Collections version.

I really wanted to have the Util pacakge not depend upon any other
libraries.  Do you think we should make an exception in case of the
Collections library?

Reply via email to