> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > How freaky. I just added the same thing but as a part of a
> > CollectionsUtils class.
>
> I thought the same thing when I happened upon it while looking through
> CollectionUtils! :)
>
> > I thought that would be a good way to hide it so
> > a later stage could see it using the Commons.Collections version.
>
> I really wanted to have the Util pacakge not depend upon any other
> libraries. Do you think we should make an exception in case of the
> Collections library?
I think so yes. Unless you can convince the leader of that project to move
into util.collections which would make the most sense from a Java
structure as collections are in util.
I'm not sure you can have a concept of a group of utilities without any
data structures, and it will be naive to think that the java data
structures will be enough.
Bay
