Ralph Meijer wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:18:15PM +0100, Ulrich Staudinger wrote: > > I agree, another top-level element is not very hany and somehow disrupts > > the order in xmpp. I suggest to set up a jep about this and putting > > <location> in presence. > > IMHO (again) this context information doesn't belong in the presence stanzas. > Not everybody wants to receive this information, and the gabber hack for > conveying music information is not nice either, in retro-spect. Again: > publish/subscribe.
IMHO i think pubsub doesn't suit this scenario. There exist many scenarios for Pubsub, but this scenario, calls for some sort of presence enhancement, since the location of a person is an elemental part of his/her physical presence in a room. Of course i agree, the gabber hack isn't very polite either. Another argument against pubsub (in this case) is integrity. The integrity of users and clients in this environment and in this scenario is based upon the acceptance of a location element, transmitted in some way. All users can only benefit from this system if a user doesn't have to willingly subscribe to such a location tag. My four cents ulrich > > > beside this, it is definitely a cool project! :) > > Sure thing! > > -- > Greetz, > > Ralphm > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
