[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-11764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=161909#comment-161909
 ] 

Adam Sloan commented on JENKINS-11764:
--------------------------------------

bump - the sorting is still a problem
                
> Emma Coverage Column: Sorting by coverage column is not numerical
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENKINS-11764
>                 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-11764
>             Project: Jenkins
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: emmacoveragecolumn
>    Affects Versions: current
>            Reporter: Steve Roth
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: Screenshot-2.png
>
>
> First off, thanks for this plugin.  I really like being able to see the 
> coverage in the list of jobs.
> One thing which we noticed is that when sorting on the 'line coverage' 
> column, the ordering seems to be alphabetical as opposed to numerical.  For 
> example, 8.72% is sorted between 85% and 78%.  (see attachment).  
> Sometimes we look for components with low code coverage; it would be handy to 
> be able to sort them numerically, so all of those which have low coverage are 
> together.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to