Daniel Beck commented on Bug JENKINS-26520

I do not understand why someone would change this without providing an alternative.

You're using BUILD_ID for something other than identifying builds, which it is meant for. So sure, it was documented as being a time stamp, but it's not unencumbered with other uses.

Breaking someone's code with no compelling reason seems, well just wrong.

The previous BUILD_ID format required tons of additional code and had several limitations, which have all been fixed by switching to build numbers. Looks like a compelling reason to me.

Best would be to change it back to the way it was. OK would be to provide a new environment variable. Preferably with the same format.

Neither going back to the old storage format, nor using a value for BUILD_ID which isn't actually the build ID, are sane options going forward IMO. A new variable should be easy to add, if maybe only in a plugin.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to