Gujjars and Meena-s of Rajasthan are indeed Kshatriya-s and economically 
advanced than the SC/ST-s.
   
  The origins of this crises started with Balram Jhakar approaching Meen-s to 
vote for him to Lok Sabha, assuring raising their status to Tribals in 
reservations for the Central/ Govt. services.
   
  The Meena-s elected him and he got them the reservations and every house in 
Meena-s have an IAS or other Central Services, scattered throughout the 
Country, andena-s are ubiquitous covering several pages in the Civil lists!!
   
  Smarting at this Gujjars, the rival Community too organised themselves to get 
the benefit extended to Meena-s, and hence this agitation, none of them deserve 
under actual conditions.
   
  When several Upper Castes in UP were included in Mandal Reports accepted by 
VP Singh (manipulated by powers at Delhi), this is only an extended demand in 
regions which would spread further making reservation policies a mockery.
  

Jharkhand Blog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
            
  
              
   Jharkhand  Blog   
   
         
   

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
             Can the Adivasi status take Gujjars forward?  
    
  
  
    
  Gujjars traditionally belonged to the Kshatriya caste, and ruled over the 
Gurjara-Pratihara Kingdom -- an area comprising almost 60 per cent of South 
Asia during the 8th and 9th centuries -- claims this Gujjar community  web 
site. 
   
  Gujjars have a glorious past, a truth no doubt. Although fairly unpopular for 
their violent conduct, Gujjars have lived on their productive labour. In 
recorded history, Rajasthan's Gujjars are an integral part of the mainstream 
caste in the region's society.
   
  Making a momentous departure -- in claiming Kshatriya-hood, Rajasthan's 
Gujjars now clamour for Adivasi status. This in itself is indicative of a new 
social mood in present day Indian society. Various social classes in the 
country aspire to re-negotiate their social locations.
   
  The Gujjars have just fought a fierce battle seeking de-location of their 
present social status. As per the deal, the Rajasthan government has set up a 
three-member committee to examine the issue, and has recommend the matter to 
the Union government. Rajasthan's Gujjars have to pass the following test to 
qualify for Adivasi status:
   
    
   Primitive traits  
   Geographical isolation  
   Distinct culture  
   Shy of contact with community at large  
   Economically backward
   
  Whether they pass the test or not is a different question altogether. We can 
only wish them good luck. Here we are faced with an exceptional social 
situation -- a situation of a ruthless fracas between the lived 
occupational-culture and yet to be lived newer aspirations.
   
  What if Rajasthan's Gujjars were to earn an Adivasi status. Can that take 
them forward? During the just ended week-long unrest, the Rajasthan Gujjar 
leadership has been citing the case of the Van Gujjars of the Shivaliks (parts 
of Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir) who enjoy Adivasi 
status for the purposes of affirmative action as available to the Adivasi 
masses of India.
   
  The Van Gujjars -- meaning forest Gujjars -- actually live in forests as 
quasi-nomads. During the winter they come down to the plains along with their 
cattle, and return to the upper Shivalik hills during summer. They are thus, 
virtual Adivasis -- though not as poor as the average Adivasi population of 
India. Their income far exceeds their needs.
   
  However, what the Rajasthan Gujjar leadership did not tell us is the fact 
that, despite the Adivasi status, the Van Gujjars could not benefit from 
affirmative action packages as available to the Adivasis. 
   
  The Van Gujjars have not been able to produce civil servants, doctors, 
engineers, or even schoolteachers. Nor have the Rajasthan Gujjars been able to 
produce civil servants, doctors, engineers, or even schoolteachers. They remain 
as backward as they had been for ages.
   
  So, if the Adivasi status couldn't help the Van Gujjars get government jobs, 
how is that going to help the Rajasthan Gujjars even if they were to be 
accorded Adivasi status? 
   
  As a matter fact, the Rajasthan Gujjars are already in the Other Backward 
Classes list, yet, they have not been able to benefit from the OBC quota. How 
do we interpret this extraordinary spectacle of backwardness of both -- Van 
Gujjars and Rajasthan Gujjars!
   
  As we know, the Van Gujjars depend on cattle for their livelihood -- selling 
milk, sheep and goats to the mainlanders. If there is any similarity between 
Van Gujjars and the Gujjars of Rajasthan, it is the culture of cattle rearing. 
   
  To Van Gujjars, cattle rearing is an absolute necessity as that is the only 
source of sustenance they know. There is no way Van Gujjars could do farming in 
the Shivalik hills, neither have they thought of immigrating to the mainland. 
They have remained with their occupational culture for ages, and arguably, are 
quite content.
   
  But, as part of mainstream society, to the Rajasthan Gujjars, cattle rearing 
is not a necessity as they have fairly good land holdings, and other 
opportunities of enterprise available around them. Rooted in their tradition, 
cattle rearing is a cult amongst Rajasthan Gujjars. 
   
  Even if a Gujjar family had for instance, a hundred acres of land, and 
additional sources of income, by tradition, the family must have a couple of 
cows or buffaloes, even few goats. In the Gujjar world, home produced pure milk 
is as dire a necessity as oxygen to most of us. Cattle rearing thus become an 
absolute necessity to a Gujjar household.
   
  Not much has been researched or written about the predicament of the cattle 
rearers. In India, cattle rearing is not recognised as an organised industry. 
By nature, even those with a single animal require the services of small hands 
-- of children, at some stage or the other during the day. Understandably, 
there cannot be a cow or buffalo that will give milk round the year. So, if a 
family has one cow, the logic of the availability of pure-milk throughout the 
year demands another cow. In the process, often, all the members including 
children are involved in taking care of the cows.
   
  So what price does cattle rearing demand from the family? 
   
  Children are less likely to enroll in schools. Those who have enrolled, are 
likely to drop out. The few who still manage to get a degree, tend to 
under-perform and hence are unfit in the job market.
   
  Rajasthan Gujjars, or the Gujjar community as a whole with few exceptions 
though, is trapped in the tradition of cattle rearing. Since the mainland 
Gujjars live in mainstream society, they watch members of other communities 
getting into government jobs, which brings instant prestige and recognition in 
society.
   
  The Rajasthan Gujjars now aspire for government positions but without 
abandoning their tradition of cattle rearing. Can the Adivasi status take 
Rajasthan Gujjars forward unless they depart from tradition and embrace 
modernity? Will the Gujjars engage in a new debate for an intensive reform 
within?
   
  rediff.com/news/2007/jun/07cbp.htm
   
   
   
   


             

  .
   
   
       
   
            
            News TV    Blog    Photo    Music    Video    Live Chat    
Directory    Testimonials    Forum    Contact  
  .
 
     

  

-- 
Jharkhand Blog
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Jharkhand Online Network
www.jharkhand.org.in/blog


  

                           

       

Reply via email to