dajac commented on PR #15212: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15212#issuecomment-1898536868
> to confirm, the previousMemberEpoch=11 should be 14 in the given example right? previousMemberEpoch=11 seems correct as the member transitioned from 11 to 15. > this seems a bit scary. should we have some check that ensures the invariant? yeah, but i am not sure how. one option would be to strengthen the validation when `currentPartitionEpoch` is modified. let me see if i can do something. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org