dajac commented on PR #15212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15212#issuecomment-1898536868

   > to confirm, the previousMemberEpoch=11 should be 14 in the given example 
right?
   
   previousMemberEpoch=11 seems correct as the member transitioned from 11 to 
15.
   
   > this seems a bit scary. should we have some check that ensures the 
invariant?
   
   yeah, but i am not sure how. one option would be to strengthen the 
validation when `currentPartitionEpoch` is modified. let me see if i can do 
something.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to