On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Marco Ceppi <ma...@ondina.co> wrote: > On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 10:26:48 AM Eric Snow <eric.s...@canonical.com> wrote: >> >> I had tried the explanation route to no avail. I'll probably work up >> a demo for the specific folks I have in mind. I think juju is one of >> those things that makes more sense when you see it in action. >> >> One thought I had is that we could work up a demo-in-a-box. Either >> make a VM image available (with local provider in it?) or fix local >> provider so that it runs entirely in VMs/containers. For the latter >> we could distribute a script that spins up the new local provider to >> make it super easy for someone to try juju out locally, AKA >> juju-in-a-box. > > We have most of this already, we spin vagrant images that have the local > provider installed, configured, and bootstrapped on vagrant up
That's great! I may be able to use this with the people I'm talking to. -eric -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
