Doing more frequent major releases than has been traditional for programming languages strikes me as not a terrible idea, honestly.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Tony Kelman <t...@kelman.net> wrote: > I'm with Kevin, having followed development (too) closely for the last > year and a half I find the prospect of 1.0 any time during 2016 totally > ridiculous and unrelealistic. Unless you fully anticipate releasing 2.0 > some time in 2017. > > > On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:52:36 PM UTC-7, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >> >> That's literally the only part of that post that I would change :-) >> >> But no, I'm not trolling, 1.0 should be out next year. Predicting down to >> the month – or even quarter – is hard, but that's what I think we're >> looking at. I'll post a 1.0 roadmap issue soon. >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Kevin Squire <kevin....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Stefan, are you trolling again? ;-P >>> >>> http://julialang.org/blog/2012/02/why-we-created-julia/ >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stefan Karpinski <ste...@karpinski.org >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Version 1.0 will be released around this time next year. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Pileas <phoebus....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Greetings, >>>>> >>>>> I have been following the development of Julia for sometime now and I >>>>> am really thrilled to know that you guys have reached version 0.3.11. >>>>> >>>>> To my understanding sometime in the near future you will release the >>>>> new version 0.4.0., a version that it is supposed to bring many changes. >>>>> >>>>> My question is simple: when is Julia expected to "mature", so that a >>>>> "universal" (more or less) documentation (or maybe more thorough books >>>>> than >>>>> those that exist by now) will follow and less bug fixed will be needed? >>>>> >>>>> I wish you the best! >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
