Could you please check with the same vlan-id ? Thanks, -sail
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VPLS with 2 interfaces on the same router > Do not put the two Giga interfaces in the same site; put them in two > separated sites and the two interfaces still in the same VPLS as they are, Why should you need to put them in two different sites? It hasn't been our experience that this is necessary. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Like this: > > > > routing-instances { > > } > > vpls { > > instance-type vpls; > > interface ge-0/1/0.100; > > interface ge-0/1/0.200; > > route-distinguisher 300:300; > > vrf-target target:300:300; > > protocols { > > vpls { > > site-range 10; > > mac-table-size 100; > > site vpls1 { > > site-identifier 300; > > interface ge-0/1/0.200;} > > > > site vpls2 { > > site-identifier 301 ; > > interface ge-0/1/0.100;} > > } > > > > Use this command to track the vpls failure reason "show vpls connections" > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Youssef Yosry > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
