I'll be interested to see how software upgrades go since ISSU isn't fully operational yet (AFAIK). The virtual chassis idea with link agg across ports on different physical chassis provides nice redundancy, but according to the datasheet, if the master switch is upgraded, all other chassis in the virtual chassis are upgraded at the same time, which seems to eliminate the redundancy that the diverse-chassis LAG might have added. I'm not sure I understand the "100BASE-FX support on SFP ports: SX" mentioned in the hardware specs either. At first glance that tells me that you can only use multi-mode 100M optics, but surely that can't be the case (they even mention 1310nm 100M SFP optics near the bottom, which would be SM). Otherwise, pretty slick sounding devices.
David On 29/01/2008, Edson Cardoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess this product will compete with Extreme Networks, Foundry, Cisco > Catalyst stuff and some others.. > > Edson > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tue 29-Jan-08 13:13 > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is ON !!! > > > > On Tuesday, 29 January 2008, Matt Yaklin wrote: > > > > Did juniper buy out another switching company or is this their > > design from the ground up? > > > Their design, according to our account team. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp