We use 'encapsulation ethernet-ccc' on all of our T-series and some M10s for transparent PtP L2VPNs and it works very well. Using extended-vlan-ccc would require you to start 'caring' about VLANs, so ethernet-ccc sounds like what you're looking for.
David 2008/5/8 Thor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thorsten Muller > Sent: 08 May 2008 09:32 > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Cc: Thorsten Muller > Subject: RE: Juniper Encapsulation question on MX960 > > > Hi, > > I have a question about the Ethernet encapsulation in L2 VPN's on a MX960 > > I want to connect a customer on a 10G interface in a p2p L2 VPN. > The customer wants to send his own vlans over the port (so the port needs to > be transparent to vlans) > > Which encapsulation do I need ? > > the documentation states: (Junos 8.5) > > ethernet-ccc > Use Ethernet CCC encapsulation on Ethernet interfaces that must accept > packets carrying standard Tag Protocol ID (TPID) values. > > extended-vlan-ccc > Use extended VLAN encapsulation on CCC circuits with Gigabit > Ethernet and 4-port Fast Ethernet interfaces that must accept packets > carrying 802.1Q values. > > What do you people suggest? > Anything else to take into consideration ? > > -- > Cheers > Thor > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp