Your best bet is the source of most knowledge on the Internet, Google. http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=Olive+Juniper+VMware&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Tim On 6/4/08 1:24 AM, "Munish Saini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > The Olive installation doc with VM ware workstation. > > Thanks & Best Regards > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:30 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 67, Issue 5 > > Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to > juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Juniper Olive. (Hernan) > 2. Re: Juniper Olive. (Peder Bach) > 3. juniper mpls mtu (cp) > 4. Re: juniper mpls mtu (Daniel Roesen) > 5. MPLS LDP (sunnyday) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:09:05 +0200 > From: Hernan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper Olive. > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > HI All: > Sombody knows, how install the Olive.. (juniper emulator)...? Could you > give > me any input about that soft.. ? or where i can > find more information. > > Thanks and regards.. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:34:04 +0200 > From: "Peder Bach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Olive. > To: Hernan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive > > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Hernan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> HI All: >> Sombody knows, how install the Olive.. (juniper emulator)...? Could > you give >> me any input about that soft.. ? or where i can >> find more information. >> >> Thanks and regards.. >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:15:30 -0400 > From: "cp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [j-nsp] juniper mpls mtu > To: <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I hoping someone can provide insight into why by default juniper > calculates mpls mtu at 12 bytes less than the ip mtu? I've been testing > using l3vpn and it seems that mpls mtu pads 8 bytes to its mpls mtu > reducing the ip mtu the inside packet by 8 bytes. Quick example. So if > mpls mtu is 1508 the ip mtu of the packet inside is 1500. That means the > ip mtu of the mpls interface is 1520. The only reason I can see > additional bytes needed on top of the l3vpn two is for fast reroute > bypass. I assume it's for the safety factor although I am probably > missing something. Any information is appreciated. > > > > -Chip > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:19:51 +0200 > From: Daniel Roesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] juniper mpls mtu > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:15:30AM -0400, cp wrote: >> I hoping someone can provide insight into why by default juniper >> calculates mpls mtu at 12 bytes less than the ip mtu? I've been > testing >> using l3vpn and it seems that mpls mtu pads 8 bytes to its mpls mtu >> reducing the ip mtu the inside packet by 8 bytes. Quick example. So if >> mpls mtu is 1508 the ip mtu of the packet inside is 1500. That means > the >> ip mtu of the mpls interface is 1520. The only reason I can see >> additional bytes needed on top of the l3vpn two is for fast reroute >> bypass. I assume it's for the safety factor although I am probably >> missing something. Any information is appreciated. > > Exactly that's the case as far as I'm aware. They have chosen a default > "enough for most usages" headroom. > > Then again, defaults may change, so it's good engineering practice to > set MTUs for all protocols explicitly. > > Best regards, > Daniel _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp