ibr1.ash> show route all inet.0: 283638 destinations, 486468 routes (283619 active, 18 holddown, 2 hidden )
ibr1.ash> show chassis routing-engine Routing Engine status: Temperature 30 degrees C / 86 degrees F CPU temperature 28 degrees C / 82 degrees F DRAM 768 MB Memory utilization 89 percent CPU utilization: User 0 percent Background 0 percent Kernel 2 percent Interrupt 0 percent Idle 97 percent Model RE-5.0 Serial ID Start time 2008-11-23 14:53:50 EST Uptime 211 days, 19 hours, 23 minutes, 19 seconds Load averages: 1 minute 5 minute 15 minute 0.05 0.10 0.04 I have a 2gig flash card installed, so is no issue. I am just trying to figure out if its a software issue/bug causing this or its just the number of routes i have. Brendan Mannella President and CEO TeraSwitch Networks Inc. Office: 412.224.4333 x303 Toll-Free: 866.583.6338 Mobile: 412-592-7848 Efax: 412.202.7094 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean Clarke" <s...@clarke-3.demon.nl> To: "Brendan Mannella" <bmanne...@teraswitch.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:58:24 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS Hi Brendan How many routes etc do you have ? The memory sounds a bit high utilised to me, if it stays at 91%. There are many bug fixes from 9.1 to 9.5, of course, if you have a 1G flash card (or no flash card) then you can upgrade anyway ... the memory should not max out. Typically the RE should be about 5% utilised, if the routes are stable cheers On 6/23/09 11:45 AM, Brendan Mannella wrote: > Hello, > > I have two M7i routers with RE-400-768s. One is running 9.1R1.8 and the > other 8.3R4.3. > > They each have one transit link landed on them and very little IBGP/OSPF. > > The router with 9.1 on it has 91% memory usage while the 8.3 has 59%. > > Now I know the more recent code probably has more features and so forth. But > I am worried that maybe that version of code has a memory leak or related > issue. > > Does anyone know of any outstanding issues with 9.1R1.8? > > The router came with this version of code on it and I don¹t like the fact > that its R1.8 but I am worried about upgrading to a more stable release as I > don¹t want the memory maxed out. > > Any suggestions? What is the most stable code at this point for this > platform? > > Thanks in Advance. > > Brendan > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp