The bottom-line is, what level of trust does Miercom deserve? Same goes for other companies doing same activities.
- Gregory 2009/9/24 Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:46:01PM -0700, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Would be interesting to see Juniper's reaction on following report: > > > > http://www.miercom.com/dl.html?fid=20090827&type=report > > These reports are total frauds, Cisco pays Miercom to produce them and > to make sure the results always come out in their favor. They typically > find edge cases to focus on, misconfigure the competition boxes, provide > no way to verify their claims, and make sure to never feature any test > in which the Cisco box fails. The Miercom 7600 vs M7i report for example > was a work of pure comedy, if not for the thought that some poor sap > might have actually believed a word of it. The FUD machine has been > working overtime against the MX lately too, because it is an first rate > box and the competition has absolutely nothing to compete against it > technically. > > -- > Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp