On Saturday 23 January 2010 10:32:19 pm Dobbins, Roland wrote: > Juniper are largely ahead of other router vendors in > terms of IPv4/IPv6 feature parity and performance, IMHO.
I think the one that really caught us badly was when we tried unit-independent policers so we can have bandwidth management for v4 and v6 separately on a dual-stack link for a customer. That crashed the PFE, very nasty. JUNOS 9.3R2.8. Later versions of code are fixed, though. With this experience (and minor previous ones), my advice would be not to automatically expect v6-based features to work just like v4 ones, particularly if you run the risk of leading to an outage. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
