We use 10.0S1.1 in a heavy production environment (750+ RVI's across 21 downstream switches in a two-stack VC chassis setup) with no issues. <knocking on wood>
10.1.R.18 is nice, but had nothing we needed in our environment to upgrade to. I would compare 10.0.R2 release notes (what 10.0S1.1 fixed) with 10.1R1.8 before making a decision. It almost sounds like by the previous reply that Juniper feels safer with the S release over the latest R release. That all being said, I thought 10.1R.18 was just 10.0S1.1 with a couple more features (that we didn't need, so we didn't upgrade twice in a week). Am I wrong here? Dan da...@appliedi.net ________________________________________ From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michel de Nostredame [d.nos...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 3:15 PM To: Alexey Kholmov Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 upgrade Hi Alexev, Current version for EX4200 is 10.1R1.8, but per Juniper that 10.0S1.1 is recommended. see https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/software/junos_software_versions.jsp for more details. Regards, -- Michel~ On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Alexey Kholmov <ale...@twine-networks.com> wrote: > Hi juniper-nsp, > > I need to upgrade EX4200. > > Please advise which version of JUNOS should I use? > > Thank you in advance! > > Regards, > Alexey Kholmov > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
