I have a section between EBGP VRF PE x CE via two physical connections (aggregate ethernet) and see the traffic unbalanced because the Junos uses the default flow.
I need the traffic between the PE x CE is symmetrically balanced way, the previous setting and did not work, and within the configuration routing-instance <name> not have all the options. Thanks Gabriel Farias 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> > You need the following: > > 'set routing-option forwarding-table export load-balance' > > and > > 'set policy-options policy-statement load-balance then load-balance > per-packet' > > Sorry for the top-post, I'm on my Blackberry. > > HTHs. > > Stefan Fouant > ------Original Message------ > From: Gabriel Farias > Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos > Sent: Mar 31, 2010 4:23 PM > > Hi members, > > > How to balance traffic between EBGP equipment Juniper M120 (PE) x Cisco > 6509 > (CE) Switch, which are connected via ethernet aggregated? > > > > I used the setup below and did not work the Juniper continues with the > output unbalanced traffic. > > > > configuration forwarding-options > > load-balance { > indexed-next-hop; > } > hash-key { > family inet { > layer-3; > layer-4; > } > } > > > Thanks, > > Gabriel Farias > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp