Stefan, Any suggestions to correct this imbalance?
Thanks, Gabriel Farias 2010/4/1 Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> > Sorry for my bad translation, follows the configuration: > > *Interfaces*: > show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/0 > description "*BA* G2/47 - SW001"; > gigether-options { > 802.3ad ae0; > } > show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/3 > description "*BA* G1/47 - SW001"; > gigether-options { > 802.3ad ae0; > } > show configuration interfaces ae0 > description "*BA* Po150 - SW001"; > mtu 9192; > unit 0 { > family inet { > address 10.251.40.53/30; > } > } > > *VRF instances*: > show configuration routing-instances dados > instance-type vrf; > interface ae0.0; > ... > protocols { > bgp { > group PEER-SW001 { > type external; > hold-time 30; > peer-as 65100; > as-override; > neighbor 10.251.40.54; > } > } > > What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical interfaces, see > that is constant unbalance > > {master} > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate > Input rate : 271677184 bps (69055 pps) > Output rate : 37802544 bps (10429 pps) > > {master} > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate > Input rate : 293302512 bps (61095 pps) > Output rate : 628471504 bps (134276 pps) > > {master} > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate > Input rate : 298597864 bps (70456 pps) > Output rate : 34856992 bps (8756 pps) > > {master} > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate > Input rate : 288075200 bps (57232 pps) > Output rate : 657782056 bps (129224 pps) > > > > > 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> > >> I'm sorry, your request is getting lost in translation. Why don't you just >> show us your configs and do a 'show route x.x.x.x' and 'show route >> forwarding-table destination x.x.x.x' for the route you are trying to >> load-balance. >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Stefan Fouant >> >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> ------------------------------ >> *From: * Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> >> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:51:04 -0300 >> *To: *<sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> >> *Cc: *<juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>; <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> > >> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >> >> I'm not using EBGP external type in PE (M120) >> >> Reagards, >> Gabriel Farias >> >> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> >> >>> Do you have multi-path enabled on your EBGP sessions? >>> >>> Stefan Fouant >>> >>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: * Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> >>> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:32:18 -0300 >>> *To: *<sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> >>> *Cc: *<juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>; < >>> juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> >>> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >>> >>> I have a section between EBGP VRF PE x CE via two physical connections >>> (aggregate ethernet) and see the traffic unbalanced because the Junos uses >>> the default flow. >>> >>> I need the traffic between the PE x CE is symmetrically balanced way, the >>> previous setting and did not work, and within the configuration >>> routing-instance <name> not have all the options. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Gabriel Farias >>> >>> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> >>> >>>> You need the following: >>>> >>>> 'set routing-option forwarding-table export load-balance' >>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> 'set policy-options policy-statement load-balance then load-balance >>>> per-packet' >>>> >>>> Sorry for the top-post, I'm on my Blackberry. >>>> >>>> HTHs. >>>> >>>> Stefan Fouant >>>> ------Original Message------ >>>> From: Gabriel Farias >>>> Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net >>>> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>>> Subject: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >>>> Sent: Mar 31, 2010 4:23 PM >>>> >>>> Hi members, >>>> >>>> >>>> How to balance traffic between EBGP equipment Juniper M120 (PE) x Cisco >>>> 6509 >>>> (CE) Switch, which are connected via ethernet aggregated? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I used the setup below and did not work the Juniper continues with the >>>> output unbalanced traffic. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> configuration forwarding-options >>>> >>>> load-balance { >>>> indexed-next-hop; >>>> } >>>> hash-key { >>>> family inet { >>>> layer-3; >>>> layer-4; >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Gabriel Farias >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >>> >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp