On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Mehmet Akcin <meh...@icann.org> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 11:46 AM, "sth...@nethelp.no" <sth...@nethelp.no> > wrote: > > >> I'd like to have some recommendation of a router model. It is for a > small > >> ISP. There are 2 or 3 upstreams which feeds the whole Internet routing > >> table. Total about 20 peering sessions. The traffic is about 2-3G in 12 > >> months. Right now we only care about Internet. But if it can scale to > >> support layer 2 and/or layer 3 VPN services, that's a big plus. > >> > >> We have dealt with M20 about 4-5 years ago. I am looking at M7i or M10i. > Not > >> sure if I am on the right path. > > > > You probably want the MX80, unless you *really* need other interface > > types than Ethernet. M7i/M10i are getting rather long in the tooth. > > Hi, i agree. MX series is way to go. You will need to spend some $$ but my > last two years with MXs (previously m7i) they worth every penny. > > Happy to answer if you have more specific questions > I looked at MX80 before. Its 20x 10/100/1000 and 80G backplane is way more than what we need. M7i is also cheaper than MX80. I went through the history of this list. M7i got pretty good review, except the hard drive issue in 2005. For what we need, M7i seems a better option. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp