Richard, I knew you should tried it :) Thank you. More and more signs that there is no many implementations but a lot of skepticism around it.
2010/10/28 Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:25:27PM +0400, Pavel Lunin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Anyone here uses dynamic-db? Works? or as always? :) > > I tried, but there is no support for it via Netconf, which pretty much > makes it a non-starter for me. :) I'm sure something else about it is > broken too, I just never got that far. > > The only other thing I noticed from the 30 seconds I played with it was > that there is no way to abandon a candidate config when in dynamic-db > mode. So if you change ANYTHING and want to not apply those changes, the > only way to quit out and not leave the session stuck open with > uncommitted changes is to manually undo the changes you made and commit > the blank config. With failure to plan or test features like that, I'm > sure it only gets worse from there. :P > > -- > Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp