I have it deployed in "enterprise-style" deployment (dual-stack for the office users), on a SRX240-H cluster running 10.2R3. It works just as expected so far.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 21:39, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > Hmmm.. interesting - I thought I had reviewed 10.2 for this support... will > dig deeper. So then comes the question - anyone actually *using* IPv6 on > clustered SRX? Any real-world feedback? > > I have an SRX210H at home and recently discovered an annoying "bug" that IPv6 > isn't supported on VLAN interfaces... that was kind of a shock to be blunt.. > > Thanks, > Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Crist Clark [mailto:crist.cl...@globalstar.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:22 PM > To: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering - IPv6 > > I just happened to be looking at the 10.2 release notes after > seeing your email. > > "IPv6 Support > [snip] > > * Chassis cluster—In JUNOS Release 10.2, we support chassis > cluster in an active-passive (failover) deployment. [Junos OS Security > Configuration Guide]" > > You may want to have a closer look at the 10.2 documentation > (the current recommended release for SRXs). I am not using > this feature so I have no personal experience whether it actually > works. > > > On 11/2/2010 at 10:43 AM, "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: >> Hi there. >> >> >> >> We are looking to bring on an additional SRX650 at a site by > clustering. >> One of the requirements though is IPv6 traffic and it appears it's > not >> supported? >> >> >> >> From >> > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/information-products/topic-c > >> ollections/release-notes/10/topic-39007.html : >> >> >> >> Chassis Cluster >> >> On SRX Series and J Series devices, the following features are not > supported >> when chassis clustering is enabled on the device: >> >> * All packet-based protocols, such as MPLS, Connectionless > Network >> Service (CLNS), and IP version 6 (IPv6) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do any of the SRX boxes support clustering with IPv6? Is there any > timeline >> on this being fixed that anyone knows of? >> >> >> >> Our goal is redundant routing engines should something happen - makes > more >> $$$ sense to add an additional SRX650 when there is one existing.. >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > -- > > Crist Clark > Network Security Specialist, Information Systems > Globalstar > 408 933 4387 > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp