Thanks... yeah, pretty much. We installed the static route and were unable to reach anything on the 172.30.200.0/24 network from a machine in the 192.168.20.0/24 subnet. On that actual machine (Windows 7) we installed a route in Windows and were able to communicate no problem (bypassing the route statement on the SRX).
This seems to imply that by using a default route you can't take traffic into an interface and route it back out the SAME interface - an issue we used to face on the Cisco PIX boxes at one time. Looking for a workaround to this - our solution at this point is to bring the 192.168.20.121 device (which is a VPN appliance that connects us to our billing platforms) in via a subnet on a directly connected interface. The downside to this is that it involves some routing changes on the VPN portion which we're trying to avoid as it involves a third party. Literally on the Cisco 2800 in place it's "ip route 172.30.200.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.121". On the SRX we have "set routing-options static route 172.30.200.0/24 next-hop 192.168.20.121". Thanks, Paul -----Original Message----- From: Michael Damkot [mailto:mdamkot...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:55 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Static Routing - SRX Paul- Just to make sure I'm tracking correctly, you've tried installing a static route and it didn't work? On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:48 , Paul Stewart wrote: > Hi there. > > > > Can anyone give any suggestion/guidance on the following. > > > > I'm trying to do a static route *out* the same interface that the traffic > came *in* on. This is on an SRX-240 > > > > Here are the details: > > "Private": 192.168.20.0/24 > > "Public": 216.168.x.x/32 > > > > Static route: 172.30.200.0/24 to <gateway - 192.168.20.224> to > 192.168.20.121 > > > > 192.168.20.121 is the IP on a VPN appliance. > > > > Traffic from a client computer never gets routed to the VPN appliance. This > works on a Cisco 2800 without a problem, but I can't get it working on the > SRX. > > > > So, to walk this through a bit more - a computer sitting on the 192.168.20.0 > subnet has a default gateway of 192.168.20.224. We want a route on the SRX > that routes any traffic coming into 192.168.20.224 that is destined to > 172.30.200.0/24 to be sent to 192.168.20.121. In Cisco 2800 it's just a > static route. > > > > Ran across this challenge in the Cisco PIX world as well.. > > > > Thanks for any input.. > > > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp