On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:37:18PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:51:01AM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > 10.4R2 is even better for MX Trio I'm told...I plan on upgrading to it > > soon. > > Beware of PR/584705 (non service affecting), no transceivers reported on > 16-Port 10GE MPC in "show chassis hardware" and "show chassis pic > fpc-slot X pic-slot Y". Interfaces do work fine it seems (incl. DOM). > R1 -> R2 regression. > > Workaround: log in to the MPC, issue "show sfp list" to get the overview > of installed transceivers (they do show up there) and then "show sfp X" > to get all the type/vendor/serial info.
Well in the first 30 seconds of testing we noticed a junk debugging log message they left in, which floods your logs with severity 3 messages: Feb 16 19:39:42.345 re0.mx240-1.lab1 /usr/sbin/sampled[1431]: %DAEMON-3: read_mpls_fec_record: HIT Feb 16 19:39:42.347 re0.mx240-1.lab1 last message repeated 8 times Feb 16 19:41:42.347 re0.mx240-1.lab1 last message repeated 11 times Feb 16 19:43:42.362 re0.mx240-1.lab1 last message repeated 7 times Feb 16 19:45:42.356 re0.mx240-1.lab1 last message repeated 15 times Feb 16 19:47:43.174 re0.mx240-1.lab1 last message repeated 12 times Feb 16 19:49:43.163 re0.mx240-1.lab1 last message repeated 11 times Feb 16 19:51:43.168 re0.mx240-1.lab1 last message repeated 9 times Feb 16 19:53:43.162 re0.mx240-1.lab1 last message repeated 8 times Feb 16 19:55:43.197 re0.mx240-1.lab1 last message repeated 14 times Sigh. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp