we're running it on trio only mx960s in production. it's got a few issues at least one our outstanding one's (frame-relay encapsulation lti interfaces not working) is fixed in 11 but I don't think we're willing to make that jump yet outside the lab.
On Jun 27, 2011, at 10:05 AM, David Ball wrote: > I'm about to stand this up on some MX80s in the lab but wondered if > any bleeding-edgers out there have already ruled it out on the > platform, and if so, why. Certainly mileage will vary depending on > what you're doing with it, but I'm asking in general (we're > dual-stacked QoS-enabled MPLS with all services in BGP-signalled VPNs > with some policing, for example). > > I know it's unreasonable to have people continually posting to the > list asking about which code is best, but I know many were waiting for > a stable 10.4 revision (due in part to its' EEOL nature) but last I > heard, 10.4R2 (or was it R3) wasn't ready for primetime. Didn't find > much in the archives about 10.4R4. > > David > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
