On 7/22/2011 1:51 AM, Kurt Bales wrote:
Hello Richard,
I would hazard a guess that because not every virtual router needs to be
running in flow-based mode (ie run some in packet-mode ala
http://datainter.cz/doc/3500192-en.pdf ), that it may be possible to not
require 2x Zones per VR.
In a similar vein, it's not uncommon to see Filter-Based Forwarding
(FBF) scenarios for those that require next-hop resolution in a
different table than inet.0. In these cases you'll use a forwarding
instance-type, but it won't be bound to any zones or require any
security parameters.
Stefan Fouant
JNCIE-ER #70, JNCIE-M #513, JNCI
Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks
http://www.shortestpathfirst.net
http://www.twitter.com/sfouant
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
