On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:29:37PM +1300, Tim Harman wrote: > Have just encountered a situation where a 1GB/s customer sending me > ~800Mb/s of traffic caused a number of Aggregated Interfaces running > LACP on EX series switches to start flapping. ... > Anyone encountered anything like this before? Any ways to mitigate?
This is why when given a choice I always like to design L2 networks to not require dynamic protocols where possible. E.g. rely on autonegotiation's Remote Fault Indication (RFI) or Far End Fault Indication (FEFI) rather than using BFD/UDLD/CFM, use static link aggregation rather than LACP, use Virtual Chassis with distributed static AE interfaces rather than use MC-LAG or STP, etc. Can you just use static AE interfaces instead of using LACP? _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp