I don't have the answer immediately for you, so I apologize. But I wanted to chime in with a "THIS IS WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT" comment. The MX is super flexible and has loads of features with respect to VLANs/BRIDGING/VPLS/PBB etc, but its confusing as shit and the documentation is not the greatest.
There really ought to be an entire book *just* about this topic. Written in a tutorial fashion. Covering Q-in-Q, VPLS, PBB, VLAN tag manipulation, bridging features, etc. All on the MX specifically. It needs to cover the various encapsulation types, "family bridge", etc. The MX solution guide isn't making it happen. Still, I heart the MX immensely. Especially now that we are finally seeing quality code on it... or better quality code anyway. Derick Winkworth CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721 http://packetpushers.net/author/dwinkworth/ ________________________________ From: Sebastian Wiesinger <juniper-...@ml.karotte.org> To: Juniper NSP <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 8:34 AM Subject: [j-nsp] MX VPLS Trunk with VLAN rewriting Hi, I'm trying to setup a VLPS "Trunk" (many VLANs - one VPLS instance) on MX960 (Trio MPC) where each site has different local VLAN-IDs which should be bridged over VPLS. Example: Site 1 ---- VPLS ---- Site 2 LAN1: vl100 vl10 vl200 LAN2: vl301 vl11 vl201 I did the following config: Site1: interfaces { ae2 { unit 100 { encapsulation vlan-vpls; vlan-id 100; input-vlan-map { swap; vlan-id 10; } output-vlan-map swap; } unit 301 { encapsulation vlan-vpls; vlan-id 301; input-vlan-map { swap; vlan-id 11; } output-vlan-map swap; } } routing-instances { test-service { instance-type vpls; vlan-id all; interface ae2.100; interface ae2.301; vrf-target target:65000:10003; protocols { vpls { no-tunnel-services; site local-ce { site-identifier 1; interface ae2.100; interface ae2.301; } mac-flush { any-interface; } } } } } Site2: interfaces { ae2 { unit 200 { encapsulation vlan-vpls; vlan-id 200; input-vlan-map { swap; vlan-id 10; } output-vlan-map swap; } unit 201 { encapsulation vlan-vpls; vlan-id 201; input-vlan-map { swap; vlan-id 11; } output-vlan-map swap; } } routing-instances { test-service { instance-type vpls; vlan-id all; interface ae2.200; interface ae2.201; vrf-target target:65000:10003; protocols { vpls { no-tunnel-services; site local-ce { site-identifier 2; interface ae2.200; interface ae2.201; } mac-flush { any-interface; } } } } } When I try to commit this config I get an error: [edit routing-instances test-service interface] 'ae2.100' interface with input/output vlan-maps cannot be added to a routing-instance with a vlan-id/vlan-tags configured JunOS version is 11.2R4 When I remove "vlan-id all" from the VPLS instance the config commits but no bridge is formed, the clients on each site cannot reach each other. Any idea what to do? Our Juniper consultant said it would be possible to do this. Regards Sebastian -- New GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) Old GPG Key-ID: 0x76B79F20 (0x1B6034F476B79F20) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
