Hi Diogo
> - verify the status of the routes in PE4. Are they being received by > the BGP neighbor ? Check the protocol NH status. Routes are not received by BGP neighbour and I verified this "show route receive-protcol bgp x.x.x.x(PE2/RR) > > - you need to have an LSP between the PE1 and your RR. Same for PE4 > and RR. But I am assuming this is fine because you see the routes > being advertised to PE4 from PE2. Yes PE2/RR is advertising routes to PE4 and I have verified this with ""show route advertising-protcol bgp x.x.x.x(PE4) > > - on PE4, you need to have a LDP route for PE1. I think this may be > your issue and this is why I suggested to check with the ping mpls ldp > command. I have the LDP route for PE1 on PE4 and have verified it under the inet.3 table. I am yet to check the ping mpls ldp part and will come back on that. I am still unclear that do we really need an LSP to the RR as RR will not overide the NH to itself while reflection ? Regards Varma On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Diogo Montagner <diogo.montag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I suggest some steps below: > > - verify the status of the routes in PE4. Are they being received by > the BGP neighbor ? Check the protocol NH status. > > - you need to have an LSP between the PE1 and your RR. Same for PE4 > and RR. But I am assuming this is fine because you see the routes > being advertised to PE4 from PE2. > > - on PE4, you need to have a LDP route for PE1. I think this may be > your issue and this is why I suggested to check with the ping mpls ldp > command. > > Thanks > > On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <svaibh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Diogo >> >> They are not hidden and have already verified the route-target.Its >> correctly configured. Any other pointer ? >> >> Also while using RR do we reallly need the Loopback IP of RR used for >> BGP peering to be present in the inet.3 table of PE coz the RR just >> reflects the route and does not modifies the NH. All we should need is >> the reachability of the remote PE Loopback IP used for BGP Peering to >> be in the inet.3 at the Local PE. Is that correct ? >> >> Thanks much for your help on this issue. >> >> Regards >> Varma >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Diogo Montagner >> <diogo.montag...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> You need check the status of the routes in PE4. If they are hidden it >>> may be a LDP issue. If there is no hidden route then your problem may >>> be wrong route-target selection. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <svaibh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Diogo >>>> >>>> I have not checked that yet but what I did check was that PE2/RR is >>>> advertising the route via BGP to PE4 and PE4 is not accepting it. >>>> Right now I do not have access to the setup. >>>> >>>> Please suggest where can be the issue and what more to check apart >>>> from the one you mentioned and I will check and revert in sometime. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Varma >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Diogo Montagner >>>> <diogo.montag...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> What happens if you do a ping mpls ldp from PE4-lo0 to PE1-lo0 ? >>>>> >>>>> On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <svaibh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Dear All >>>>>> >>>>>> I was testing a setup whereby I am using mix of LDP and RSVP in the >>>>>> backbone for transporting MPLS VPN Traffic. The setup is something as >>>>>> below: >>>>>> >>>>>> CE1--PE1------PE2/RR-------PE3----PE4------CE2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Now we have a limitation that we can only run LDP between PE4 and PE3. >>>>>> From PE3 to PE2/RR we have RSVP. From PE3 to PE1 we have LDP Tunneling >>>>>> over RSVP. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now the routes of CE1 are not getting installed into the VRF Table on >>>>>> PE4. When checked the inet.3 table I do not see the route for PE2/RR >>>>>> Loopback but only PE1 and PE3. >>>>>> I tried to add a default static into inet.3 or importing the inet.0 >>>>>> rib to inet.3 on PE4 but still am not seeing routes. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the issue is that the BGP Next Hop is not in inet.3 for >>>>>> PE2/RR. How can I achieve to make this setup working apart from >>>>>> running LDP Tunneling over RSVP between PE4& PE2/RR or between PE3 & >>>>>> PE2/RR. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Vaibhava Varma >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sent from my mobile device >>>>> >>>>> ./diogo -montagner >>>>> JNCIE-M 0x41A >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards >>>> Vaibhava Varma >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from my mobile device >>> >>> ./diogo -montagner >>> JNCIE-M 0x41A >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards >> Vaibhava Varma >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > ./diogo -montagner > JNCIE-M 0x41A -- Regards Vaibhava Varma _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp