Hi Ivan Yes I understood the part for the domain-tag and also realized the issue with instance-type for the routing-instance but unfortunately since this was an existing network running over there I could not change it back to virtual-router.
Regards Varma On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Ivan Ivanov <ivanov.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, this is because the 'domain-vpn-tag 0'. The other thing that it is > doing is to zeroes the tag. > > What type of routing-instance you are using on the CE? To not have the check > on the CE you can use 'routing-instance type virtual-router' instead of > 'routing-instance type vrf' > > Then you will not need 'domain-vpn-tag 0'. > > HTH, > Ivan, > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:14 AM, vaibhava varma <svaibh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi Ivan >> >> I could not get the manual loop prevention thing working as whenever I >> tried to set any tag while redistributing mp-ibgp to OSPF and then >> match the same on other PE while importing into OSPF it did not work. >> I was not able to see any tag being set. >> >> However I have found a fix for this solution by increasing the OSPF >> protocol preference value to higher than BGP on the PEs under the >> ROuting-Instance. >> >> Regards >> Varma >> >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Ivanov <ivanov.i...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > You can prevent this by implementing manual loop prevention. You can use >> > the >> > tag field in the external LSA to tag the routes and based on that to >> > filter >> > them on the other PE. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Ivan, >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:08 PM, vaibhava varma <svaibh...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Ivan >> >> >> >> I finally got the routes on the VRF-Lite CE by using two commands on >> >> the >> >> PE >> >> >> >> domain-id disable >> >> domain-vpn-tag 0 >> >> >> >> >> >> I have a dual homed setup with two PE and 2 VRF-Lite CE. Will this not >> >> cause routing loop because the CEs will share the route and will send >> >> the routes back to other PE which will have an MP-iBGP route with >> >> preference 170 and OSPF route with preference 10/150. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Varma >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Ivan Ivanov <ivanov.i...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > Yes, this could be the case. >> >> > >> >> > domain-vpn-tag 0 >> >> > >> >> > This will delete the DN bit option in Junos. (This works only on Type >> >> > 5 >> >> > and >> >> > Type 7 LSAs) >> >> > >> >> > HTH, >> >> > Ivan, >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Arun Kumar <narain.a...@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> If its a VRF lite CE with OSPF running, then the same loop >> >> >> prevention >> >> >> mechanism is applied i.e. if Downbit or Domain tag is set, then VRF >> >> >> lite CE >> >> >> do not accept it. In case of Cisco as CE, there is a command to >> >> >> disable >> >> >> this >> >> >> "capability vrf-lite". But with Juniper as CE, I am not aware but if >> >> >> there >> >> >> is a CLI to disable this Down bit check that should do. >> >> >> >> >> >> thanks, >> >> >> Arun >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> Vaibhava Varma >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best Regards! >> > >> > Ivan Ivanov >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards >> Vaibhava Varma > > > > > -- > Best Regards! > > Ivan Ivanov -- Regards Vaibhava Varma _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp