On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Riccardo S <dim0...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I'm wondering if anybody have info or experience in a scenario > with mixed virtual-chassis (6 equipments between 4500 and 4200) with high > density > (more or less 70) of 10GBs ports. > > Since these architecture should be placed in a > very sensitive position (servers and storage managing online systems of an > important airport), > I'd like to have some "informal" feedbacks if any problems or whatelse have > been experienced by somebody... > > Why chose this design ? only costs...
Sounds like "carrier grade" to me. My understanding is there is still no high-speed stacking module for the EX4500 expansion slot. Your virtual-chassis obviously won't approach full wire-speed. With that said, when you need a mixture of 1000baseT and SFP+ ports, it is a decent configuration. ARP still sucks on the small-EX platforms but it has improved in 12.3, which is a welcome change. Still pretty bad though. They have made `clear arp` do what it's supposed to do, but I guess adding something like `clear arp interface <foo> all` was too hard. Go figure. -- Jeff S Wheeler <j...@inconcepts.biz> Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
