On 06/04/13 03:59, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > No, this is not possible (and why would you need it?). If you think > about this for a moment, it would require the ability to have 16k or > so MAC addresses per physical interface. Highly unrealistic.
I can think of one common case, many IX's and shared (colo usually) transit lans do static mac filters, and if you need to move the port being able to override the mac can get you back up far quicker then dealing with a support tech who may not understand the problem. If that's a low-speed circuit aggregating it can make sense which can easily lead to a request to do per-VLAN mac's. -- Julien Goodwin Studio442 "Blue Sky Solutioneering"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
