Ok, that is fine. So basically SRX1400 will do fine as BGP router + firewall?
Regards, jim > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX1400 opinions > From: jjo...@danrj.com > Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:11:19 -0500 > CC: xmi...@gmail.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > To: jim.howl...@outlook.com > > Good, you cannot run UTM on the data center SRX at the moment, branch only. > > On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:55 PM, James Howlett <jim.howl...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Thank you for the heads-up > > > Srx's have replication issues with large routing environments. Duplicating > > two full feeds to the redundant peer will take a looooong time. In some > > testing many hours. > > > > With that said the 1400 can do it. Just keep that one major caveat in mind > > when you want clustered fail over. > > > > > I have a budget only for one 1400 at the moment. > I don't plan to run UTM on it as well. > > Just few bgp sessions, firewall and some DDoS screening. > > Regards, > jim > > > Hope this helps, > > -Tim Eberhard > > > > > > On Apr 27, 2013, at 10:14 AM, James Howlett <jim.howl...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have a network build on J4350 and SRX240 and i need to upgrade. I was > >> thinking about switching two devices for SRX1400. > >> My network has 2 full bgp feeds and some peerings. We use about > >> 150-200Mbps average. Will SRX1400 be a good choice then? > >> > >> Best regards, > >> jim > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
