Hi Jim, On 29 April 2013 05:49, James Howlett <jim.howl...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Hi Paul, > > Thank You very much for the clarification. I will have only one ASBR. As > for redundancy I'll go with a single 1400 unit and add a second in the > future. Still, a single SRX1400 will be probably more stable then a single > J6350. > I recently had a client that had a simliar plan to you of a single SRX1400 now to a HA pair later. No BGP though, when we setup the first SRX we configured it as if it was part of a HA pair and left it running in a Active/Lost state. Once we got the second SRX we followed the SRX HA Hardware replacement procedure in the Juniper KB and it all went smoothly with no hiccups or outages. http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21134 -- Regards, Craig Askings io Networks Pty Ltd. mobile: 0404 019365 phone: 1300 1 2 4 8 16 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
