My CGNAT works very well. Currently providing NAT for a few /16s of private space.
On Sep 18, 2013, at 11:13 AM, rkramer wrote: > I currently use MX240's throughout my routing environment today, and I'm > looking to upgrade my existing NAT boxes, which are Cisco ASR's. They are > running out of horsepower, and from what I'm seeing, MS-DPC's on MX's > provide more than enough capacity... I'm not planning to do any > firewalling at the NAT locations, just nat pools and 1:1 nat translations, > with some 6to4 thrown in for good measure. > > > Anyway, I'm assuming someone on the list has to be running MX's doing NAT? > How is it working out for you? Any pitfalls? > > > Ryan Kramer > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
