isn't that accomished essentially with the interface-routes stanza, or is
my interpretation off?
On Friday, February 14, 2014, Matjaz Straus Istenic <mat...@njetwork.si>
wrote:
> On 15. feb. 2014, at 08:19, Matjaz Straus Istenic
> <mat...@njetwork.si<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Maybe you should install local (interface) router in your nat-vrt
> routing instance as well.
> Fat fingers and fast typing, I had "direct _routes_" in mind. For example:
>
> policy-statement ... {
> ....
> term InstallLocal {
> from {
> protocol direct;
> route-filter ...;
> }
> to rib nat-vrf.inet.0;
> then accept;
> }
>
>
> > Or, at least the ones your need -- the vlan.105.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Matjaž
>
>
--
..mobile ryry..
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
