There is an ER 057607 for this issue. Another option is to use IPv6 router advertisements instead of VRRP.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Laurent CARON <lca...@unix-scripts.info> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently deploying SRX110/210/240. > > After having configured the IPv4 part, i'm willing to configure IPv6 VRRP. > > It however seems the functionnality is severely broken in many points: > > [1] states: > - VRRP for IPv6 will not work if the Branch SRX platform is processing > IPv6 in flow mode. > - If the SRX is processing IPv6 in packet mode...However, even in this > state, the SRX will not be able to process any packets, which are forwarded > to the VIP address. > > This is quite not useful. > > The 'solution' offered on [1] is to set the interface in promisc > mode...which: > 1/ is not really a good advice since all packets will hit the PFE > 2/ is not possible if you are using aggregated (ae) interfaces > > How did you guys solve this issue ? > > Thanks > > > [1]: http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content& > id=KB23988&actp=search&viewlocale=en_US&searchid=1258894870731 > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp