On Thursday, November 13, 2014 08:02:19 PM Daniel Verlouw wrote: > vRR ? We’re about to re-evaluate our RR deployment and > going ‘virtual / PC-based’ is certainly high on our > list. Too bad there's hardly any info on vRR around, or > I'm looking in the wrong place (which is not terribly > hard after yet another poor redesign of jnpr.net....)
When I was testing it I found it too slow, and most of the coolness we wanted was coming later in 14.x. CSR1000v was a lot quicker (we deployed it in ESXi) and the feature set was where we wanted it. My guess is vRR is good to go now. I'd certainly not be spending money on a real router for route reflection, particularly if you are inclined to only running Junos for this. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
