If you use one 10x10GE MIC and one 20x1GE, on the paper 120 Gb/s would mean no oversubscribing, but how the capacity will be really divided?
> Tom Storey <t...@snnap.net> wrote : > > As was explained to me a while back, the MPC3E has ~120gbit of capacity. > > But the devil was in how that capcity is shared between the two MIC slots. > > When you have two active MICs that capacity is divided equally between the > two MICs: 50/50% or ~60/60gbps. It is NOT a case of operate one card at > full whack and only use a couple of ports on the other. > > If you plan to put in a second 10x10 MIC then you'll have to shuffle your > circuits around to balance them across the two MICs too. > > And if you need all wire speed ports then you need the 16x10G MPC3, and > only use 3 ports of each PIC. > > On 30 November 2014 at 23:22, Robert Hass <robh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> I'm currently using MPC3E with one 10x10GE MICs in my MX480 and MX960 >> routers. >> >> I need to add 10GE ports, if I will put second 10x10GE MIC in existing >> MPC3E what will be oversubscribe rate ? I'm not sure but docs says about >> 200Gbps for MPC3E then It should be wire-speed if docs claims full-duplex >> or 1:2 if docs claims half-duplex. >> >> What is best solution (from price point of view) to have 16 x 10GE in 1 >> slot on MX480/MX960 ? MPC3E + 10x10GE MICs or something different ? _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp