xxxxxxxx@mx5> start shell
% less /var/run/dmesg.boot
JUNOS 12.3R8.7 #0: 2014-09-19 15:52:00 UTC
    
buil...@tiabeth.juniper.net:/volume/build/junos/12.3/release/12.3R8.7/obj-powerpc/junos/bsd/kernels/JUNIPER-PPC/kernel
WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
cpu0: Freescale e500v2 core revision 3.0
cpu0: HID0 80004000<EMCP,TBEN>


[admin@mk] > /system resource print
                cpu: e500v2
          cpu-count: 2
      cpu-frequency: 1066MHz
           cpu-load: 0%
  architecture-name: powerpc
         board-name: RB1100AHx2
           platform: MikroTik




2014-12-12 13:07 GMT-02:00 Scott Granados <sc...@granados-llc.net>:
> Mikrotek, ouch, the only thing I found they were good for is target
> practice.:)
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2014, at 12:19 AM, Eduardo Schoedler <lis...@esds.com.br> wrote:
>
> Em quarta-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2014, Jordan Whited
> <jwhited0...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>> I found the issue still present in 12.3R8.7 running on an MX80. In
>> 11.4R7.5
>> with sampling enabled it was taking upwards of 12 minutes for routes to
>> propagate to the FIB when taking in a full ipv4 with ~250k active-paths,
>> in
>> 12.3R8.7 I measured it closer to 3 minutes. Seems to be improved, but
>> still
>> unacceptable.
>
>
> What do you expect from a PowerPC processor that's used for mikrotik's
> routerboards?
>
> Thake a look in dmesg.
>
> --
> Eduardo Schoedler
>
>
>
> --
> Eduardo Schoedler
>
>



-- 
Eduardo Schoedler
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to