Here is the output of 'show route extensive'. Hopefully it shows up formatted
properly this time. router1> ...oute 2001:db8:4000::1 extensive
vr-1.inet6.0: 9 destinations, 13 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0
hidden)2001:db8:4000::1/128 (3 entries, 1 announced)TSI:Page 0 idx 0 Type 1 val
15b53b0 Nexthop: Self Localpref: 100 AS path: [65471] I
Communities:Path 2001:db8:4000::1 Vector len 4. Val: 0 *Direct
Preference: 0 Next hop type: Interface Address:
0x15b877c Next-hop reference count: 2 Next hop:
via lo0.1, selected State: <Active Int> Local AS:
65471 Age: 1w0d 17:26:33 Task: IF
Announcement bits (3): 0-RT 4-BGP_RT_Background 5-Resolve tree 2
AS path: I AS path: Recorded OSPF3 Preference: 10
Next hop type: Router Address: 0x15b8944
Next-hop reference count: 1 Next hop: via lo0.1, selected
State: <Int> Inactive reason: Route Preference
Local AS: 65471 Age: 1w0d 17:26:28 Metric: 0
Area: 0.0.0.0 Task: vr-1-OSPF3 AS path:
I AS path: Recorded BGP Preference: 170/-101
Next hop type: Indirect Address: 0x15b93a8
Next-hop reference count: 3 Source: 2001:db8:4000::2
Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 595 Next hop:
fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0, selected Protocol next hop:
2001:db8:4000::2 Indirect next hop: 162c000 -
State: <Int Ext> Inactive reason: Route Preference
Local AS: 65471 Peer AS: 65471 Age: 21:46:03 Metric: 1
Metric2: 1 Task: BGP_65471_65471.2001:db8:4000::2+51820
AS path: I Accepted Localpref: 100
Router ID: 192.168.172.253 Indirect next hops:
1 Protocol next hop: 2001:db8:4000::2 Metric: 1
Indirect next hop: 162c000 - Indirect
path forwarding next hops: 1 Next hop type:
Router Next hop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via
ge-0/0/8.0 2001:db8:4000::2/128 Originating RIB:
vr-1.inet6.0 Metric: 1 Node path
count: 1 Forwarding nexthops: 1
Nexthop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0
Jonathan> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] iBGP and IPv6
> To: lordsit...@hotmail.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> From: mark.ti...@seacom.mu
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 07:45:00 +0200
>
>
>
> On 14/Apr/15 19:37, Jonathan Call wrote:
> > Why does the router flag the BGP route for the IPv4 loopback as Unusable
> > but doesn't do the same for the IPv6 loopback address? Does it even matter?
>
> Can you "show extensive" for the route?
>
> Also, try formatting your paste better - I can't quite make it out.
>
> Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
