Hi Chuck,
I'd like to hear about the war stories from EVPN as well. I was really disappointed to hear that Juniper does not consider implementing PBB-EVPN on MX at all. So it seems now that we are stuck with high memory utilization and all the drawbacks of pure EVPN. adam > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > Of Chuck Anderson > Sent: 05 May 2015 15:48 > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EVPN > > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:53:54PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Is anyone doing EVPN in production yet? > > I take it from the deafening silence that either no one is doing EVPN > in production, or no one is willing to admit it. > > Is anyone willing to share any experiences with EVPN, such as results > from testing in the lab? I'm spinning up my lab now. > > I'm mainly interested in using EVPN on MX as a replacement/instead of > deploying VPLS in an enterprise environment in order to move to a > purely L3/MPLS core (eliminate L2 bridging and STP from core). > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp