correct. On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
Eventhough the RE-2000 is going into EOL status, it is still faster and has more memory than the RE's in the MX80 or MX104 right? On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jerry Jones <jjo...@danrj.com> wrote: The RE-2000 and SCB have been announced EOL for next year. On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> wrote: I am considering buying a used MX480. It will have the following: 1x MX480-PREMIUM-AC - MX480 Base system with redundant RE-2000, SCB, and AC power 2x DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP - 4x10GE Enhanced DPC for MX, requires optics sold separately 1 x Juniper MS-DPC - IP services line card for MX Series Requires Junos OS Release 9.3 and later Assuming we have the latest software version from Juniper to install on this used box, is there anything we should know about this potential setup? I believe this DPC cards are EOL, but I think many people are still using them. I know there are more dense MIC cards out there, but that is not needed at this time. I think everything about this system is redundant besides the MS-DPC, but I could get another one of those too. Are there any licensing restrictions or upgrade restrictions I should be aware of? Does Juniper have any locks or software limitations on these larger routers like they do on the MX-5 through MX-80 and MX 104? Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know or consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the MX240 is too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960. I would be upgrading from a MX80, so this is quite a jump. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp