On 30/Nov/15 13:27, Saku Ytti wrote:
> For either of these NAT is bit awkward, as it's going to have to go > via separate service card anyhow. Unless you could live with 1:1 NAT, > but I believe CarrierNAT implies NAPT. > If all traffic is NAPTed traffic, you might want to go with ASR1k instead. Agree - if you want NAT, the ASR1000 is the ideal platform for this. The ASR1000 line has just got a refresh as well, so from a scaling perspective, you've got both the low- and high-end options. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
