Thanks Setting route preference helped :)
Johan On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Charles van Niman <char...@phukish.com> wrote: > What route preference is your IGP route, and what IGP? I assume your > discard/static has a route preference of 5? Also, do you mind pasting > the show route extensive output? Is your static discard route in the > same routing-instance/VRF as the BGP prefix? > > /Charles > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Johan Borch <johan.bo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I have implemented RTBH in my small network of 8 routers. DFZ is running > in > > a L3VPN and each router has an multihop ibgp-session with my RTBH-router > > and it works, but I have one thing that annoys me. > > > > If I announce an offending IP to be black holed, only one of the routers > > will point to the discard route. The other 7 will see the announced route > > via BGP från the one that got it first I guess and send the traffic to > that > > one where is is discarded. If I do show extensive on the route it is > prefer > > because of IGP. I can't figure out how to get each router to prefer the > > discard localy. If I do local pref on one router the other 7 will send > the > > traffic there instead. > > > > Every router has > > > > route a.b.c.d/32 { > > discard; > > install; > > } > > > > And from sending RTBH router, they are announced with next-hop a.b.c.d. > > > > Idéas? :) > > > > Regards > > Johan > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp