On 17/Apr/16 11:56, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
> > Yep me too. > > At a much lower price, what do you think of using a qfx5100 as P/LSR > router ? The mpls support look correct, and it have a lot of 10G ports. Looking at the notes, it should be fine as a P router, even if you are running native BGPv6 in the core, since that table is less than 30,000 entries today. If it can do everything the PTX1000 can do as a P router, I'd go for it. For those of us that run native BGPv6 in the core, I'd be concerned when the table gets too big. But short of that, test all the features to ensure the Q5 chip will do everything you've been accustomed to on the Trio chip (assuming you have the MX already), and if you're happy, go for it. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp